SkyZone Case Study
Multi-location brands fight a quiet, expensive war on Meta. The default playbook, one national creative and one national landing page, treats every shopper the same, regardless of which of the brand's locations they actually live near. Engagement metrics go up. Conversions don't follow.
Sky Zone, the trampoline park chain with hundreds of locations, was bleeding budget to this exact dynamic. High-intent shoppers were being served generic membership ads, then dropped onto a brand-level landing page where they had to hunt for their local park. The hand-off between ad and destination broke before purchase intent could carry it through.
The root cause sat one level deeper. Meta's algorithm rewards engagement signals like click-through rate, and generic creative tends to win on those signals. The platform was optimizing for the wrong end of the funnel, and the Sky Zone's media spend was paying for it.
The breakthrough wasn't localization on its own. It was the seamless match between what the ad promised and what the page delivered.
The moment a user clicked an “Algonquin, IL” creative and landed on the Algonquin Park page, cognitive load dropped to near-zero.
The funnel held because the hand-off didn't break. Engagement was never the right signal; intent alignment was.
DCO won the test outright at a 90% confidence level. Sky Zone cut acquisition cost by 23%, lifted Return on Ad Spend by 45%, and delivered roughly 20% more purchases on similar spend.
Reach efficiency was the most lopsided dimension: DCO bought 9.2M impressions versus standard Meta's 2.0M on roughly the same budget, for an 80% lower CPM.
The Affluent segment told the sharpest story. There, DCO drove a 3.18x ROAS, nearly double standard Meta's 1.61x in the same market, while cutting CPA nearly in half.
Ready
to get started?
Turn your diminishing returns into focused growth and holistic marketing strategies.